Linguistic Clues Narrow Identity of Country A in Mueller Probe

Fascination continues about the identity of Country A in Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference.  An unidentified corporation is a witness in the investigation and is owned by Country A.

Recent developments provide clues in the unredacted portions of unsealed court rulings and party filings.  Based on linguistic analysis of court rulings and pleadings, Kristina Arianina, a senior associate with a linguistics background, narrows the number of potential candidates.  Continue Reading

DOJ 2018 Policy Shifts in Review

Department of JusticeIn 2018, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) issued many important policy updates and rollouts that will have far-reaching impact. Our firm’s Alert provides an easily navigated yet detailed summary of developments. Policy Shifts at the Department of Justice – 2018 in Review focuses on government investigations and white collar prosecutions.

The Alert covers: Continue Reading

Will Russia Provide Missing Links to Murder, Kickbacks, Bribery?

The case against Leonid Teyf, a Russian citizen, in a federal court in North Carolina has enough juicy facts for an international crime novel. The U.S. prosecutors need evidence to convict Teyf and his accomplices of the central charges, stemming from an alleged kickback scheme in Russia. Will Russia provide missing links?

Continue Reading

Russia Continues Anticorruption Efforts in 2019

Russia continues its anticorruption efforts in 2019. These efforts build upon numerous convictions last year.  In January 2019, despite the two-week public winter break, two significant cases developed. Beyond seeking additional convictions, the Russian government will implement public anticorruption outreach this year. Continue Reading

UPDATE – FSIA Mystery in Mueller Subpoena Case

Some “mysteries” surrounding the Mueller investigation’s grand jury subpoena case may soon come to light.  Adding another unusual twist to the case, on January 22, 2019, the Supreme Court allowed the “mysterious” corporation, owned by Country A, to file a writ petition under seal, with redacted copies for the public record. Continue Reading

M & A and the FCPA in the New Year

Resolving corruption problems found during international mergers and acquisitions should be more certain in the New Year. Potential problems under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) can be handled in light of guidance provided by the Department of Justice (the DOJ).  Continue Reading

DOJ Recovers More Than $2.8 Billion for False Claims

Hand Giving CashThe federal government’s recoveries for false claims during FY2018 topped $2.8 billion. The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released this and other statistics for its civil False Claims Act recoveries since 1986. Although the most numerous and lucrative recoveries occurred in the health care industry, the DOJ reported 35 new qui tam cases involving the Department of Defense during FY2018. For a fuller discussion of the statistics, see our post here in the Triage blog.

DOJ Relaxes “All or Nothing” Yates Memo

The U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has softened its policy known as the “Yates Memo.” That policy required companies to produce all relevant information on individuals involved in misconduct in order to be eligible to receive any cooperation credit with DOJ attorneys. Rather than the prior “all or nothing” approach, the new policy requires the company to “identify all individuals substantially involved in or responsible for the misconduct at issue.”

New Policy Incorporated Into Justice Manual

The new policy is incorporated into the DOJ’s revised Justice Manual (formerly US Attorneys’ Manual) in the section on the DOJ’s Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations, particularly 9-28.700 (The Value of Cooperation).

Reason For The Change

DOJ Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein announced the revised policy in a speech to the American Conference Institute’s International Conference on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act on November 29. During the same speech, Rosenstein explained the rationale for the policy change, advising that the Yates Memo had unrealistic consequences, saying “we learned that the policy was not strictly enforced in some cases because it would have impeded resolutions and wasted resources,” and that “[o]ur policies need to work in the real world of limited investigative resources.” He further said, “[w]hen we allow only a binary choice –full credit or no credit – experience demonstrates that it delays the resolution of some cases while providing little or no benefit.”

The Yates Memo, introduced in 2015, drove a hard line. Its “all-or-nothing” approach required that a company undertake a careful analysis before beginning cooperation to determine whether it could meet the threshold to earn credit. The approach also exacerbated prosecution conflicts between a company and its employees.

Civil Attorneys May Exercise Discretion

In addition, the Deputy Attorney General explained that DOJ civil attorneys will have more discretion to resolve litigation. “When criminal liability is not at issue, our attorneys need flexibility to accept settlements that remedy the harm and deter future violations, so they can move on to other important cases.” He added, “[o]ur civil litigators simply cannot take the time to pursue civil cases against every individual employee who may be liable for misconduct, and we cannot afford to delay corporate resolutions because a bureaucratic rule suggests that companies need to continue investigating until they identify all involved employees and reach an agreement with the government about their roles.”


The change marks a shift similar to the manner in which the DOJ handled corporate cooperation from 2006 to 2015. It appears that DOJ expects that these changes will increase companies’ willingness to cooperate with the DOJ and lead to more efficient prosecution efforts.

CMS Proposes Invalidating Adjuster Methodology and Recouping Past Improper Payments From Medicare Advantage Organizations

On October 26, 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule that will, among other initiatives, allow CMS to recover higher dollar amounts of improper payments made to Medicare Advantage.

To read more about this ruling and what it might mean for you, click here to read a recent Squire Patton Boggs alert on the subject.